Are computers making us dumber as they get smarter? Maybe it's part of the master plan . . . .
I can still remember how impressed I was with my father’s academic friends. Whatever I said to them, they always had an answer. I’d point to a ship in my book, and they’d tell me about the Bremen, the Lusitania, and the United States . . . all the great passenger liners. I’d talk about elephants and they answered with stories of Africa, Asia, Hannibal’s warriors and the Indian Maharajahs. I was so impressed with their vast knowledge.
I read books all day long, and it seemed like I didn’t know a fraction of what those grownups knew. Of course, they were thirty and I was seven, but I wasn’t old enough to take subtle points like that into account.
My grandparents didn’t know nearly as much. I’d ask my grandmother about helicopters, and she’d just say, Honey child, I don’t know a thing about helicopters! When I asked why she didn’t know, my grandfather had the answer. Those college people know a little about everything, but nothing about anything. I doubt any of them could plow a field!
I never did get the chance to see if my parents’ friends could plow fields. But as
I got older, I realized folks who could talk intelligently about many topics were pretty rare, and the ones who knew more than the most superficial tidbits were rarer still. I was just lucky to have a bunch of them in my life early on. So it was a neat thing, finding new people like that as I got older.
By the time I was eighteen, I knew a few good places to look for people who knew something about everything. The Umass Science Fiction Society, for example, was full of geeks with an overabundance of esoteric knowledge. As time passed, I found more and more pockets of arcane understanding throughout the Pioneer Valley, where I lived.
The knowledgeable people I found were always rare and special. Consequently, I grew up believing knowledge was something to be treasured. Not anymore. Any fool with a Blackberry or Iphone can look up life’s answers at the drop of a hat, provided there’s cell phone service. So where does that leave the knowledgeable geeks of yesterday? I guess what was special has become ordinary, at least on first glance.
What happened? Did the pocket Internet make everyone smarter? Or does it just facilitate snappy comebacks, with a sixty-second web browser delay? I used to think the Internet was a tide that lifted all boats, knowledge wise, but now I wonder if the opposite is true. I think the Internet and information technology in general makes us dumber, in some key ways.
When I was a kid, you had to actually memorize and know the capitals of foreign countries if you wanted to talk geography. And you never knew when that might happen. Even today, I know Ulan Bator is the capital of Mongolia, and Quito is the capital of Ecuador. I can point them out on a map.
So what, today’s young people say. The iphone will tell you more about Ulan Bator in sixty seconds than I could possibly remember. That’s true, but by relying on the computer, we stop training out minds, and we stop filling our memory banks. By doing so, I believe we diminish our ability to solve life’s problems unaided, and we become more and more dependent on machines. When the machines give us answers, we seem superficially smarter, but we really are dumber, because we’re not building the networks in our brains to solve a whole host of problems.
Want another example of this? Think navigation. I went my whole life looking at maps and finding my way. I have a long, long history of reaching my destinations, whether on foot, by boat, or by car. I looked at a map, related it to the world around me, and found my way. All too often, navigation today is handed off to a machine. Many motorists can’t make sense of a basic road map, or estimate the distance between two points on a printed page. They are lost if their machine loses touch with the satellites.
Most of the time, technology works as it should. People get to their destinations faster thanks to computers. But people who rely on machines have given up something vital yet intangible. They’ve lost the ability to think it through a navigation problem themselves. They have become slaves to machines out of intellectual laziness, and the laziness makes them less smart. The brain wiring that solves navigation problems allows us to solve other problems too. Computers don’t have that flexibility, and neither do we when we abdicate our thinking to machines.
I think this point is lost on many young people today. After all, if they have not developed certain processing abilities in their minds, how can they know what they are missing? I know, because I see what I lose when I rely on technology and it fails. I think of my frustration when my car gets lost, and I recall all those times when I solved my own problems and found my own way, uneventfully albeit a bit slower.
For many people, web browsing has replaced book reading. Recent studies suggest that their attention spans are reduced as a result. When we rely on a computer to look up facts, instead of our own memory, the price may not be obvious. But I believe it’s there, and it real.
It’s a point to ponder for sure. Easy answers aren’t always free.
I read books all day long, and it seemed like I didn’t know a fraction of what those grownups knew. Of course, they were thirty and I was seven, but I wasn’t old enough to take subtle points like that into account.
My grandparents didn’t know nearly as much. I’d ask my grandmother about helicopters, and she’d just say, Honey child, I don’t know a thing about helicopters! When I asked why she didn’t know, my grandfather had the answer. Those college people know a little about everything, but nothing about anything. I doubt any of them could plow a field!
I never did get the chance to see if my parents’ friends could plow fields. But as
I got older, I realized folks who could talk intelligently about many topics were pretty rare, and the ones who knew more than the most superficial tidbits were rarer still. I was just lucky to have a bunch of them in my life early on. So it was a neat thing, finding new people like that as I got older.
By the time I was eighteen, I knew a few good places to look for people who knew something about everything. The Umass Science Fiction Society, for example, was full of geeks with an overabundance of esoteric knowledge. As time passed, I found more and more pockets of arcane understanding throughout the Pioneer Valley, where I lived.
The knowledgeable people I found were always rare and special. Consequently, I grew up believing knowledge was something to be treasured. Not anymore. Any fool with a Blackberry or Iphone can look up life’s answers at the drop of a hat, provided there’s cell phone service. So where does that leave the knowledgeable geeks of yesterday? I guess what was special has become ordinary, at least on first glance.
What happened? Did the pocket Internet make everyone smarter? Or does it just facilitate snappy comebacks, with a sixty-second web browser delay? I used to think the Internet was a tide that lifted all boats, knowledge wise, but now I wonder if the opposite is true. I think the Internet and information technology in general makes us dumber, in some key ways.
When I was a kid, you had to actually memorize and know the capitals of foreign countries if you wanted to talk geography. And you never knew when that might happen. Even today, I know Ulan Bator is the capital of Mongolia, and Quito is the capital of Ecuador. I can point them out on a map.
So what, today’s young people say. The iphone will tell you more about Ulan Bator in sixty seconds than I could possibly remember. That’s true, but by relying on the computer, we stop training out minds, and we stop filling our memory banks. By doing so, I believe we diminish our ability to solve life’s problems unaided, and we become more and more dependent on machines. When the machines give us answers, we seem superficially smarter, but we really are dumber, because we’re not building the networks in our brains to solve a whole host of problems.
Want another example of this? Think navigation. I went my whole life looking at maps and finding my way. I have a long, long history of reaching my destinations, whether on foot, by boat, or by car. I looked at a map, related it to the world around me, and found my way. All too often, navigation today is handed off to a machine. Many motorists can’t make sense of a basic road map, or estimate the distance between two points on a printed page. They are lost if their machine loses touch with the satellites.
Most of the time, technology works as it should. People get to their destinations faster thanks to computers. But people who rely on machines have given up something vital yet intangible. They’ve lost the ability to think it through a navigation problem themselves. They have become slaves to machines out of intellectual laziness, and the laziness makes them less smart. The brain wiring that solves navigation problems allows us to solve other problems too. Computers don’t have that flexibility, and neither do we when we abdicate our thinking to machines.
I think this point is lost on many young people today. After all, if they have not developed certain processing abilities in their minds, how can they know what they are missing? I know, because I see what I lose when I rely on technology and it fails. I think of my frustration when my car gets lost, and I recall all those times when I solved my own problems and found my own way, uneventfully albeit a bit slower.
For many people, web browsing has replaced book reading. Recent studies suggest that their attention spans are reduced as a result. When we rely on a computer to look up facts, instead of our own memory, the price may not be obvious. But I believe it’s there, and it real.
It’s a point to ponder for sure. Easy answers aren’t always free.
Comments
My children, for all the "problem solving strategies" that they are taught in school seem to believe that it's more important to know how to find the information than to know and understand the information, that a quick perusal of a resource based on immediate need for the subject material is sufficient to get them through life. While they might be able to succeed in many ways with that sort of resourcefulness, they are shortchanging themselves, their peers, their future coworkers and their children by not training their own integrated processors. At this rate, the human mind may yet be overtaking by the computer in terms of processing speed for all but autonomic processes. It takes and interminably long time for them to reason their way through something sometimes. I have smart kids, too. It pains me to see them rely so heavily on extantly accessible knowledge while simultaneously letting slip the internal pathways needed to process the information comprehensively.
Thanks for all your thought provoking work on this blog!
“In order to get what we’ve got, Anita, we have, in effect, traded these people out of what was the most important thing on earth to them — the feeling of being needed and useful, the foundation of self-respect.”
and
"If it weren’t for the people, the god-damn people” said Finnerty, “always getting tangled up in the machinery. If it weren’t for them, the world would be an engineer’s paradise.”
So it goes...
His answer was ..... “not only do they not use computers, but they refuse to use mobile phones!”
Great aunt is 84 years and still plays the organ in Church every Sunday. My auntie Yolanda is a true glowing version of a walking encyclopedia.
Conclusion “why are we in such a hurry?” and “who is controlling who?”
Perhaps it’s time to step off the carousel!
Superb Post John
I think our value system is all out of whack. We use our heads, or now computers, to chart our course through life and through interactions with others. But it's our hearts that should be leading the way. That is what differentiates us.
We are not thinking machines. We're loving beings. Essentially. Whether you still actually use your own brain or you log on to get your answers. The bottom line is the head should not be ruling the heart. If we got back to what's real, what's the most important, the intellect, whether it's machine or organic, would take a back seat to what is in our hearts. Then communication would be extraordinary and of the sort that NO machine could possibly compete with. Unless of course they come up with one that learns how to love.
Am I less intelligent because I have mastered the art of the Google query rather reaching for a dusty copy of the Britannica?
There was a great short story on the Twilight Zone where everyone had an implant that allowed them instant access to all information-great stuff until the power goes out.
I still read a lot of good old fashion paper and ink books, I still go to museums and look at real art, I still travel and still use maps to find my way. But digital info is so way cool.
What are the odd the two of us would have run across each other in the real world?
This is a great topic and you have given me a lot to think about.
i think your grandfather's statement is right on target, even if i tend toward the kind of person who can talk a lot about a little. but i can do practical things, too.
However, I think this short-attention-span, I-just-need-to-know-where-to-find-the-info generation is a temporary phenomenon inherent in the transition to a more enhanced cognition of humanity. People used to concentrate their thinking on fewer areas because there simply was less information available. On the other hand, not concentrating on any area and not going into the depth of anything at all is an overreaction to the quickly changing society.
True value comes from diving deep into something. Technology exposes us to more knowledge and therefore allows us to find better places to dive deep into. It also provides us with tools to dive more efficiently.
If we get more value from life, I have no problem if that is because we use technology more. Some say technology makes us dumber, but there is little point in comparing the non-technologically encanced smartness of a 2009 internet surfer to that of a 1900 farmer; a lot of the surfer’s total smartness and skills have to do with interfacing with technology, being part of a global knowledge and cognition flow that would not have been possible a hundred years ago. I see it a bit like going from single cells to multi-cellular organisms: we lose some abilities that were important for life as single, isolated cells, but we are better off as parts of the whole body.
I am optimistic about our future. Technology offers the promise of a much better life; we just have to learn how to use it.
great post!
So yes we memories less but we work more on understanding complex concepts because of the internet.
Hey are you still feeling the effects of the TMS or have they gone away. Is your anxiety still lower? Can you look people in the eye more still? Please answer.
veronica@sheehanmiles.net
It is tempting to decry change as loss - we don't teach much Latin or Greek any more, but 50 years ago classical languages were seen as a cornerstone in the foundation of a good education and any movement away from them was viewed by the establishment in similar terms.
I'm a 60+ year old teaching 20 year olds and find the freedom from rote and memorization in modern education both challenging and exhilerating. The curriculum of the internet age is more demanding than the one I experienced - locating, evaluating, understanding and integrating information and concepts and learning to use that knowledge to create value for others.
Our grandfathers could learn their trades from their fathers - or even from their grandfathers. Often we can't even understand the work our kids do - and our grandkids?
Then I am a pretty dedicated optimist - so maybe I'm all wet here -
John - I love your posts, love your site and community. Thanks for all you do for our Aspergian community.