Can We Outgrow Autism?
Earlier this week news reports presented a study describing children who supposedly “grew out of autism.”
There’s been a lot of talk about what really happens, and whether people
can “grow out” of being autistic as they get older. The authors of the story call that an
“optimal outcome.”
I’ve written this essay in response to the many queries I
got, asking for my take on that news.
Well, here it is . . .
In my book BE DIFFERENT I describe the process by which we
can learn how to compensate for ways autism disables us, and by doing so,
emerge in part or in whole from disability.
Psychologists say we learn adaptive strategies, and some of
them work very well indeed for those of us with the cognitive resources to make
full use of them. I’ve certainly seen
how they helped in my own life. I was
disabled as a child, but no one would call me disabled today. I’m independent and function, as are many
autistic people.
But that’s the thing . . . I’m still autistic. What about the kids in the study?
They ranged in age from teens to twenty-one. All were screened for autism using the
gold-standard ADOS tool, and their scores were deemed below the threshold. Yet they too had been disabled as children,
and all had received formal autism diagnoses before age five. There were
thirty-four of them in the study.
What the study found is that those kids – as they grew up –
improved so much in functionality that they no longer qualified for an ASD
diagnosis even though they were well above threshold as kids.
The study does not really say “they grew out of being
autistic;” rather it says they no longer have diagnosable symptoms. In fact the authors make this same point,
saying the people may still have symptoms that escaped detection or were
sub-clinical.
We don’t yet have a brain imaging test for autism, so we
can’t look in their brains and say how they might have changed. It’s all speculation, but I’ll bet they
didn’t change much. I don’t believe you
outgrow autistic brain differences.
Yet I do believe we can outgrow autistic disability. The degree to which we succeed varies but most
of us get better as we age. In addition,
recent studies suggest that our brains may develop in a more typical direction
much later in life – even in middle age – and that may help older people like
me.
Furthermore, I think this study gives real and legitimate
hope to any family raising a kid with autism because it highlights the great
improvements that are possible for some of us.
If you have a five year old with autism, I’d think that would be very
comforting to read.
At the same time, we should be careful not to read too much
into this. As the authors say, the kids
who emerged most fully were relatively mildly affected to begin with, and they
started out with good IQ scores. Kids
who start out more disabled may progress just as far, but their different
starting point might still leave them with significant disability as adults.
I’ll offer another point of perspective. All the same tools used for the kids in this
study have been used on me. I’ve been tested repeatedly with the most recent
round being last August. In that ADOS
screening, I was still above the ASD diagnostic threshold. In the facial recognition tests, I was also
well above threshold. In the social
function, I was above threshold.
The thirty-four kids in the study therefore tested less
disabled than me, and I am not really disabled in daily life. But my differences still show up on the
tests. What does that suggest? Some of us do an excellent job of masking
disability, especially in middle age.
Hopeful as that sounds - be cautioned! Any of us can suffer setbacks at any time. Successful as I seem, life circumstances could change for me in an instant, and I too could find myself crippled by the same autism that makes me seem exceptional today. The past does not always predict the future, and even though I say we generally get better, there can still be setbacks.
The takeaway from that: Any of us may need supports at any time of life. Even people like me - seemingly independent and successful.
Another takeaway: If my life is a guide, it suggests smart people will fool the testers, while remaining autistic. Using myself as an example, no reasonable psychologist would suggest I should be evaluated for autism if I appeared in his office for depression, marriage counseling, whatever. Yet when I participate in autism studies and am screened by blind evaluators, I come up on the spectrum every time.
And more importantly - when I am tested in some of these cutting edge studies that look for patterns of autism in brain imaging, plasticity, or other "hard" parameters . . . I am in the same autistic group. So my adaptation gets visibly better while the internal differences seem to remain the same.
In my case all the science says I am autistic as always, but it shows less and less the older and wiser I get. My guess is the kids in this study were more mildly affected than me and are examples of the same thing. I have no way to be certain, of course, but that's my suspicion. That's in no way a criticism of the study; just an opinion from a middle aged autistic with some experience of the science.
In the final analysis, I choose to stand by my own phrase: many of us emerge from disability as we get older. Whether we emerge in whole, in part, or whether we go back and forth depends on many things including life circumstances and where we ourselves start out. I've said that for years. While the phrase popularized by this study - outgrowing autism - sounds hopeful, I do not in my heart believe it's real. Looking like everyone else is not the same as outgrowing autism - even when tests don't show disability at that moment.
So what’s the conclusion?
Take hope, I say, because I’ve always said we get better with age, and
this study affirms it even if I do take issue with its catchphrase. Also take hope
because the kids in this study all test BETTER that me, in terms of not having
traits of disability, and I’ve done pretty well. At the same time, try to be realistic in your
thinking. This study highlights some
individuals who adapted remarkably well.
Not everyone will succeed to that degree. Be happy with what you are, they are, and we
are, knowing life is a never ending process of change and growth and we autistic
people are part of it just as you are.
John Elder Robison
PS - - -my newest book - RAISING CUBBY - is coming March 12. Order your copy here
Comments
I've learnt enough adaptive strategies in order to present for the vast majority of the time as "normal"....until I'm stressed, tired or have the loud, bright random happen.
** “Some children who do well become quite independent as adults but have significant anxiety and depression and are sometimes suicidal,” said Dr. Fred Volkmar, the director of the Child Study Center at the Yale University School of Medicine.
That, because of the new study, is about to change.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/17/health/some-with-autism-diagnosis-can-recover-study-finds.html?ref=health&_r=0&pagewanted=print
Love the post and the comments - all are right on.
The measures used in the study were much more extensive than the ADOS or facial recognition test, as neither of these measures fully assess the symptoms associated with Autism. They also are not identified as accurately measuring either overall severity or potential effective disability in everyday functioning.
However, the VABS measure used assessed functioning levels in daily life. One could not determine their level of disability as compared to your level of disability based on the ADOS and facial recognition tests alone. You could have scored higher on the VABS test if you were assessed, considering your reported levels of daily functioning.
It should be no surprise that people close to these thresholds in childhood, achieve adaptations above the thresholds later in life.
You and Temple Grandhin do not have invisible disabilities; it is obvious in your videos and her videos that both of you are still substantially impaired in non-verbal communication.
There is no indication of this in many other individuals in the public arena claiming a diagnosis who come across as not distinguishable from the general population, however non-verbal impairments are currently not a mandatory requirement for a diagnosis, nor is any measure required to assess Autism other than the DSM5 manual and a qualified professional.
http://sfari.org/news-and-opinion/viewpoint/2012/how-do-we-measure-autism-severity
I was born in 1950, before there was any knowledge of Asperger's/autism. I had problems but learned to function reasonably well and went on to have a successful career in IT. At the age of 41, however , I suffered a a bad fall and head injuries while mountaineering.
Fortunately I recovered from the physical injuries but was left with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
I tried my best to cope with that but at age 45 I was retired with ill Health, being unable to cope and have been unable to work since.
At the age of 60 I was diagnosed with Aasperger's Syndrome and have since discovered just what you surmised, that the PTSD destroyed many of my coping mechanisms, leaving the Asperger's to come to the fore unchecked.
We do learn coping and some will learn well and that can, of course, in certain individuals, lead to them no longer displaying any symptoms. Yet take those learned mechanisms away and all will be revealed.
I can see how disability varies during life and different situations. Someone said AS children often face problems in school, high school, or moving out, when the social demands exceed the capabilities.
I was a lonely, isolated geek with no friends, however I managed well all the way through high school, and no one had second thoughts about my social abilities.
Then for different reasons I went into nursing school, and although I learned a lot in the social department, and consider myself a different person today my difficulties were clearly exposed, and I did not make it through the final round of clinical training.
Although my abilites are way better today than they was as a child, I was hindered by them recently, while I was not in childhood.
Well, as I say, this is a fan letter. I also wanted to tell your brother that his books are a delight, and have helped me, but there's no option for e-mail on his website anymore. So, if you will, pass along my admiration for him. I wrote about him on my blog, too.
http://www.thecriticalmom.com
In my case, these changes (I do think they are improvements) have made my life better. I am still creative and analytical. I'm still me.