Temple Grandin and The Autistic Brain
Temple Grandin’s new book – The Autistic Brain – is in my
opinion her most insightful work to date.
It’s also a stylistic departure from anything she’s done before. Perhaps that because it’s co-written with
science writer Richard Panek.
The central thesis of this book is that autistic people are
different because their brains are different.
Not our minds – our brains. For
many of us this is a novel but probably more correct way of thinking about
autism and neurodiversity.
Consider this phrase: autistic people are anxious because
anxiety is a byproduct of autism.
Temple asks a very insightful question.
She says, Brain scans have shown my amygdala is quite a bit larger than
average. Might that explain why I feel
anxious?
We’ve made huge advances in brain imaging over the past
fifteen years. For most of that time,
Temple has offered herself as a research subject at various university
hospitals. This book synthesizes all she
has learned, and leads readers to ask how our own neurology may define who we
are and how we feel.
There’s no talk of a cure in this book – Temple seems
content with who she is. Other books
describe journeys of transformation; this story details her journey of
understanding.
Indeed, her hypotheses that behavioral differences of autism
are tied to physical differences in the brain implies a sort of
permanence. If you think you are
anxious because your mind processes data differently, that’s an abstract way of
seeing things that leaves open the possibility that you will think differently
one day, and perhaps be less anxious as a result. Imagining oneself to be anxious because of an
over-large amygdala seems to me much less changeable.
Maybe that is simply the reality of things. After all, she’s in her sixties and I’m in my
fifties, and both of us felt anxiety as kids and we feel anxiety today. We have certainly learned to manage it
better, but anxiety remains a part of both of us, and it’s probably with us to
stay.
Some may find that deterministic or disturbing, but I don’t
see it that way. I think it’s simply a
more realistic way to think, in terms of explaining why we are different. It’s not necessarily correct to think there
isn’t hope for change – and she points this out. For example, she says her own life has become
immeasurably better, thanks to antidepressants.
And she hints at other therapies that are on the horizon.
In the end, it all comes down to this: knowledge is
power. My own life was transformed when
I learned of my own autism, and exactly how I was different from other
people. Temple’s new book gives a new
level of understanding, and many new hypotheses to ponder. That can’t help but empower those who take it
all in, and cogitate upon her words.
The Autistic Brain is something anyone could benefit from
reading, and I recommend it to anyone with a personal or professional
connection to autism or neurological difference.
John Elder Robison is the NY Times bestselling author of
Look Me in the Eye, Be Different, and Raising Cubby. He is both an adult with autism and a parent
of a son with autism. He lives in
Western Massachusetts.
Comments
Thanks for this. Also don't miss New Yorker writer Jerome Groopman's very insightful review of Temple's book:
What is autism?
The mind - which runs on the hardware of the brain - may be influenced by structure (like in autism) but it's also shaped by experience (which creates work for therapists!)
I think tying an autistic behavior to a structural difference (as opposed to leaving the door open to learned behavior, refrigerator mothers, etc) is a more accurate or correct way to see things.
Temple also talks about two different kinds of visual thinking too. The pattern/spatial and the object/picture. That is great and I wonder if you see yourself as the pattern/spatial or the object/picture. I'm interested in cars but am an object/picture thinker more strongly but would like to learn more about electronics. Do you think the stronger picture thinker could get to know electronics by 'seeing' them or does one absolutely have to be the pattern/spatial type of visual thinker to gain an intimate understanding of electronics.
Patty