Is Change Coming at Autism Speaks?
Today’s news that autists Stephen Shore and Valerie Paradiz
have joined the Autism Speaks Board of Directors came as a surprise to
many. The announcement follows on the
heels of other big news from that organization:
- Mr. Wright has stepped down as chairman and resigned from the board;
- Mrs. Wright has stepped back from the organization after a cancer diagnosis;
- President Liz Feld has announced she will be leaving soon;
- Chief Science Officer Rob Ring has announced his resignation.
It’s possible that a
new day is about to dawn for the largest and most controversial autism
organization. For the first time, they
have put actual autistic people in positions of power. They may take more positive steps when the
top management is replaced (time will tell.)
I certainly hope the organization can change its focus to
one that is more constructive, and less demeaning to autistics. I hope we’ve seen the last of the ugly
missives like “I am Autism,” Suzanne Wright’s offensive 2013 editorials, and
the suggestion that autistic people are somehow MISSING (we’re not.) They’ve got a powerful PR machine. Maybe they can use it to say the right
things, for a change.
It’s harder to raise money when there are no villains and
demons, but it can be done. Will they
rise to this challenge, or fall back on the old ways?
I’m not an insider, so I have no special knowledge, but I
have some concerns about the board and some big donors. In the past, a significant amount of Autism
Speaks funding came from people with anti-vaccine agendas, and followers of
fringe or discredited science. How much
influence do those people hold today? I
don’t know, but it worries me in light of their history.
It also concerns me that the volunteer base is so heavily
dominated by parents. That’s really what the group is: AUTISM PARENTS. Can they embrace actual autistics to truly
begin to speak for the community? There
are a few autistic volunteers there now, and that’s a good sign.
After I wrote this, several people wrote me privately to
remark on the role of parents. I've
edited my post to add the following, to clarify that my words were not anti
parent; simply a recognition that the actual autistics come first in an autism
advocacy group. An autism parent group,
on the other hand, is the opposite.
Autism Speaks has always portrayed itself as the former
while effectively being the latter.
With those words, I don't want to make parents out as demons
or villains. They have made very real contributions to the autism movement, and
in fact we'd be nowhere without them.
But autistic kids grow into autistic adults, and for such a large
organization, the percentage representation of actual autistics involved with
Autism Speaks is far lower than it should be. My words are in no way an
indictment of parents, simply a recognition that Autism advocacy is first and
foremost about Autistic people, and secondarily about families. Both need support, and their wants and needs
may sometimes differ and even be at odds.
I wish Valerie and Stephen all the success in the world in
moving Autism Speaks onto a healthier course. They join Kerry Magro, Amy
Gravino, and the other autistic volunteers who have struggled to turn that ship
these past few years. The organization’s
fundraising power could do tremendous good, if redirected in a constructive
way. Over the past decade, too much
money has been wasted on nonproductive science, and too little spent on real
deliverable benefit to the community.
Critics have said this for years.
With the leadership stepping down, there’s an opportunity for the next
management to seek a new direction.
Autism Speaks would be wise to focus on this goal:
Develop tools and therapies that benefit the people who live with autism today.
Let go of the genetics, and the pharma studies that may pay off for the next generation. Autism family concerns are today. If the families who funded the science you've done so far knew what it got them, would they fund it again? Or would they look to someone who truly has their interests at heart?
I hope they succeed.
I hope they succeed.
Autism Speaks has taken a step by appointing two autistics to the board. Let's see what happens now. Will Autism Speaks Listen?
(c) 2015 John Elder Robison
John Elder Robison is an autistic adult and advocate for people with neurological differences. He's the author of Look Me in the Eye, Be Different, Raising Cubby, and the forthcoming Switched On. He's served on the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee of the US Dept of Health and Human Services and many other autism-related boards. He's co-founder of the TCS Auto Program (A school for teens with developmental challenges) and he’s the Neurodiversity Scholar in Residence at the College of William & Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia.
The opinions expressed here are his own. There is no warranty expressed or implied. While reading this essay may give you food for thought, actually printing and eating it may make you sick.
Comments
It is ridiculous they'd want to listen to two persons who have doctoral degrees who can get married and make good livings who are barely affected by their autism if at all.
They really need to get Roger Kulp on their board. He's my choice and someone who could really be effective in straightening them out and endorsing scientific research that will help find answers for a lot of autistic people as soon as possible.
I am still trying to find help in the DFW area of Texas.
I got this blog address from ADHA community sites